
This newsletter deals with the situation where an exchange of letters may be sufficient to create a lease, the duty of disclosure to insurers and important changes to company law that apply from 1 July 2003.
Property Law
Retail Leases
Does the lack of an executed agreement mean no retail lease?
The Administrative Decisions Tribunal has recently held that the exchange of a number of
letters may be sufficient to create a lease under the Retail Leases Act ("RLA"), even
where there is no executed lease in registrable form ( Randi Wixs Pty Ltd v Pokana Pty Ltd (No.2)
(2003) NSW ADT 4).
In that case, the tenant had been in occupation of the premises for a number of years. The
lease had expired and the tenant remained under a holding over. The mere fact that the tenant
remained in occupation under a holding over was not sufficient to create a new lease under
the RLA.
The landlord served the tenant with a valid Notice to Quit. Subsequent to the issue of the
Notice, the landlord and tenant negotiated a new higher rental without reference to the former
lease. The tenant paid the higher rent and continued to occupy the premises.
There was also correspondence between the landlord and the tenant concerning the issue of a
new lease. The term of the new lease,
and the size of the bank guarantee were agreed.
The landlord's solicitor submitted a new lease, which did not correspond in its terms to
the agreed terms. The tenant refused to sign it. The matter was then litigated.
The Tribunal concluded that the exchange of letters and the agreement to pay the increased
rent constituted a valid retail lease under Section 8 of the RLA. For a statutory lease to
be created under this Section, it is not necessary for there to be an executed lease. A Section
8 lease can come into effect once the tenant takes possession of a retail shop and starts to
pay rent to secure occupation of that shop. It did not matter that the tenant was already in
occupation as its continued occupation was pursuant to the new agreement, not the holding over.
The moral of this story for landlords is:
- do not let a new tenant occupy premises before the lease is signed. If you do, you may
end up entering into a statutory lease which is inconsistent with the lease you wish the tenant
to execute;
- if the tenant is in occupation under a holding over, make sure the expired
lease enables you to increase the rent so you can refer to that expired lease when you increase
the rent.
Tricia Hutton
Email:
tricia@parrycarroll.com.au
Phone: 8257 3110
Insurance Law
The duty of disclosure to insurers
When seeking insurance, you have a legal duty to disclose to the proposed insurer facts
which:
you know, or which a reasonable person in your circumstances could be expected
to know;
would be relevant to the insurer in their decision to accept the risk, and
if so, on what terms.
In the recent case of Permanent Trustee Australia Limited v FAI General Insurance Company
Limited (In Liq)(2003) HCA 25, the High Court had to consider the request to FAI
by Permanent for an extension of its insurance cover for a period of 30 days "pending the obtaining
of information relating to a renewal". At the time the extension was sought, Permanent did
not disclose to FAI that Permanent had decided that if it obtained reasonable cover elsewhere,
it would prefer not to renew with FAI (because of doubts as to the credit rating of FAI).
A major claim first came to notice during the extension period and FAI refused to pay the
claim on the grounds that it would not have agreed to the 30 days extension if Permanent had
disclosed the likelihood that it would not renew its business with FAI.
The High Court held:
- that the duty of disclosure under the Insurance Claim Act only related
to things affecting the insurance risk;
- that moving the business elsewhere did
not affect the risk during the 30 days period; and
- therefore, that the claim should
be paid.
The High Court was wary of giving an insurer an "out" in not disclosing a fact that
didn't affect the risk.
By way of contrast, if in the extension application FAI had specifically asked whether or
not Permanent had decided to renew with FAI, then any misrepresentation might have allowed
FAI a remedy under the Trade Practices Act. Permanent had been very careful in its conversations
with FAI and was found not to have been fraudulent or guilty of misrepresentation by silence.
It is important to make full disclosure to insurers of all matters that may affect risk
to reduce the chance of the insurer refusing a claim.
Selwyn Black
Email:
selwyn@parrycarroll.com.au
Telephone: 8257 3113
Company Law
Important new provisions that apply to companies from July 1 2003
Annual returns: Annual returns for companies are abolished with effect from 1 July
2003 . Instead, ASIC will now send you or your agent an annual statement package on your review
date (based on the anniversary of your company's registration date) that will include a company
statement to review and an invoice statement to pay. You must pay the annual review fee within
2 months and review the company statement and notify any changes within 28 days. If the information
is correct, no documents are required to be lodged with ASIC, however you must still pay the
review fee.
New Form 484: You must still advise ASIC about changes to company details throughout
the year when they occur. The form for notification of changes to company details is a new
Form 484 Change to Company Details which is three forms in one:
- Section A for change of registered office and/or principal address and name
of ultimate holding company;
- Section B for changes to company officers and to special
purpose company status; and
- Section C for changes re shares and members' register.
If there is only a change in one section and not the others, only that section should be
filed. No fee is payable if lodged within 28 days of the effective date of the change but late
fees apply if lodged outside of the 28 day notification period ($65 if lodged within a further
one month and $260 if not lodged within a further one month).
Solvency resolution: The directors of most companies must pass a solvency resolution
within 2 months of the review date. If the directors pass a positive solvency resolution, there
is no need to lodge any notification of a positive solvency resolution. If the directors pass
a negative solvency resolution, they must lodge a Form 485 within 7 days after the resolution
is passed. If the directors have not passed a solvency resolution within 2 months of the review
date, they must lodge a Form 485 within 2 months and 7 days after the company's review date
unless the company has lodged a financial report with ASIC in the last 12 months.
Public companies - other changes: Public companies need only advise changes to member's
details and share structure at time of review and there is no longer a requirement for directors
of public companies and their subsidiaries to cease at the age of 72 years unless appointed
by a special resolution.
Proprietary companies – other changes: Proprietary companies must within 28 days
of the change advise changes to issued shares, changes to their ultimate holding company and
changes to the top 20 members being changes to name and address of members, increase or decrease
in shares held by members, new members and cessation of members. In addition, Form 201 Application
for Registration as an Australian Company will now include the requirement to notify details
of issue of shares and members.
Transitional provisions
The most generous transitional arrangement is that if changes to company details using new
Form 484 are received by ASIC between 1 July and 30 September 2003 , ASIC won't charge late
lodgement fees, regardless of the date of change .
Other transitional arrangements are:
- if a company's review date is between 1 July and 30 September 2003 , a company
has until 28 October 2003 to bring its records up to date without incurring a late review fee;
- for
the new rules about telling ASIC of changes to share and member details, if the change occurred
before 1 July 2003 (when it was not required by law to be notified), then the company will
have until 28 days after their first review date to update these details; and
- ASIC
will accept and not charge late fees for 'old' Forms 203 (change to address) and 304 (change
to officeholders) lodged by 30 September 2003 .
Peter Carroll
Email:
peter@parrycarroll.com.au
Telephone: 8257 3186
|